RGGI, a cap-and-trade program involving several Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states, requires power plants to purchase allowances for their carbon emissions through quarterly auctions. Proponents claim the proceeds fund clean energy and resiliency projects, but opponents point out the program’s regressive nature, hitting low-income households hardest through higher utility rates. During Governor Glenn Youngkin’s administration, Virginia exited RGGI in 2022, saving ratepayers nearly $1 billion in just two years, according to state records. Now, with Democrats controlling the General Assembly, bills are advancing to bring Virginia back into the fold, potentially extracting $500 million annually from Virginians.

Bloxom, a Republican stalwart from Accomack County, detailed the auction mechanism’s flaws in recent House proceedings. He noted that regions like Norfolk require billions for flood resiliency projects amid rising sea levels, prompting lawmakers to engineer this revenue stream. ‘This convoluted auction is a costly way to collect revenue,’ Bloxom stated, emphasizing that an external auction house skims over 5% off the top – far more than the typical collection costs for traditional taxes, which hover around 1-3%. The auctioneer, often a private financial entity, profits handsomely while Virginia taxpayers foot the bill.

The math doesn’t add up for fiscal conservatives. When Virginia participated previously, $828 million flowed out to RGGI coffers between 2020 and 2022, passed directly onto consumers via Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power bills. Rejoining now, with RGGI allowance prices surging 80% in recent auctions, would amplify those costs. Bloxom argued that 20 years ago, tracking emissions was impossible with available technology; today, the system remains opaque, with no robust controls ensuring funds reach intended resiliency efforts.

Norfolk’s plight is real – the city faces recurrent flooding, necessitating seawalls, pumps, and infrastructure upgrades estimated in the billions. Yet tying solutions to a multi-state emissions trading scheme raises questions about accountability. Proceeds are divvied up among participating states, not earmarked solely for Virginia projects. Critics like Bloxom contend this is less about climate action and more about generating revenue without the political fallout of a direct tax hike.

Republican leaders, including Governor Youngkin, have vowed to fight the reentry. Youngkin’s office touted the exit’s savings, warning that RGGI exacerbates energy poverty at a time when inflation-pinched families need relief. Dominion Energy’s ongoing offshore wind projects, already billions over budget and funded partly through rate hikes, exemplify how green mandates inflate costs without reliability guarantees.

House Republicans, a minority in the Democrat-led chamber, are mounting opposition through amendments and public hearings. Bloxom’s district, encompassing rural Accomack and Northampton counties, relies heavily on affordable energy for agriculture and fisheries – sectors vulnerable to utility spikes. ‘They bonded it to do their projects,’ he observed, suggesting the program’s structure prioritizes special interests over broad taxpayer relief.

As the session progresses, the battle lines are clear: fiscal responsibility versus expansive climate agendas. With energy prices volatile amid global tensions, Virginia families deserve transparency on costs. Rejoining RGGI risks reversing hard-won savings, funneling billions interstate while auction intermediaries cash in. Lawmakers must scrutinize whether this ‘initiative’ quacks like a tax – and if so, reject it outright.

https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2032010465199415296/vid/avc1/320×568/vYMQugufPieBREVy.mp4?tag=14

Source: Field reports and eyewitness accounts.